03.09.21 Pasco Board of County Commissioners Hybrid Virtual Meeting (Afternoon Session)

good afternoon everyone i would like to call back to order the pasco county board of county commissioner meeting on march 9 2021 i'd like to remind everyone to please silence all electronic devices and mutual microphones now's the time for to proceed with public hearing agenda starting with uh p 80 ordinances item p 80 was published in the tampa bay times on october 28 thank you thank you mr chairman victorious pito's planning and development department item p80 is an ordinance amending the pasco county comprehensive plan providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps 2-15 and sheet 20. uh changing from res 3 residential 3 dwelling units per gross acre to res 6 residual 6-12 units per gross acre and approximately 77.21 acres of real property located on the south side of tower road south of bexley village drive providing for imperial severability and an effective date this comes to you with the recommendation of approval is there anyone here to speak replica yeah there is an applicant for this so if only has a presentation there is someone um signed up in the cube for p80 however our understanding is okay wait a minute we still got people to speak here um i just wanted a about the applicant yeah okay i didn't realize it or not okay just one correction to the agenda the commission district this is this project is in commission district four okay let her speak there commissioners this is barbara will height 6327 grand boulevard new florida 34652 this is our third hearing you've already had the transmittal hearing the planning commission has recommended um the adoption unanimously we haven't had any public comment so because of that i'm not really sure nobody's contacted me with any concerns so i'm not really sure what the concern or question or presentation might be so i'd like to defer until we hear whomever it is about to speak to you okay i have uh i believe one person nobody signed up on for email or anything read no email okay so i got someone at the kiocks and we'll speak to this item please state your name and address for the record sorry there's no one at the kiosk for this item individuals sign up on webex oh so they're on webex yes yes okay i'm sorry thank you so we have um johann hernandez on webex to talk to item p80

[Music] good afternoon chairman and council members my name is joanne hernandez and i am a public policy administrative student at petersburg college i would like to address the follow the pdd21-0047 which is the ordinance amendment pasco county company has a plan providing for a large-scale conference and planned amendment to the future land and located in the south side of tower road south of marxley village drive with a project area of 77.21 acres now the board of county head commissioners had adopted a comprehensive plan on june 15th of 1989 which has been amended and on november 19 2020 local planning agencies held a public hearing on the proposal for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment and on january 12 2021 the transmittal was approved now the florida department of economic opportunity concluded that the existing land is residential 3 and the proposal land used to land use be residential 6. with the board's approval this land would create 325 new homes suited for single and multi-family residential developments with the maximum density of six dwellings and residential care now the potential user could be the potential use could be for single families multi-family use duplex multi-family units condominiums in town homes now the surrounding areas are occupied by single-family homes and subdivisions in the north south east and west and in order for the land to be blended and the existent surroundings the sonic amendment would need to be approved now the neighbors in the surrounding areas had concerns of apartments being built and this would not be the case the area's high price and affordable housing would not be an option these homes would be built for workforce housing which work for houses focuses on providing attractive and affordable homes for middle-income service workers such as police officers teachers nurses in close proximity to their jobs now there is a high demand on housing and i would like to see this project approval the focus on these new homes for our middle income service workers would be great these are the essential workers that risk their lives every single day to make sure we're healthy safe educated during the pandemic i wanted to thank you for your time and i would like to also thank sonia walling jeffrey couch and terry excuse me and ontario's peters for their time and assistance thank you thank you for your comment mrs we need your address for the record please i do apologize that's eight seven one five indies drive in hudson

thank you all right thank you thank you does anyone else sign up okay back to the applicant mr chairman i don't know i have no issue with this but i think we need a correction just for the record from that cr isn't this district uh four districts that's what terry said when he oh i guess i need to catch that i just missed that part okay okay you did you did say that i'm sorry i was he took care of that oh yeah as well hack she get disconnected coming back they have been they have been muted um commissioners all i would just i want to just point out that we are not proposing any multi-family apartments just single family detached homes and town homes there's a companion mpud let's go into planning commission on the 25th of march and um and red six followed up thanks for before apartments in any event so we would ask for your uh approval please okay pleasure the board i mean just let's see if the district commissioner wanted to make a motion oh i'm motioned to approve second i got a motion uh to approve in a second uh by roll call vote district two commissioner moore aye district three commissioner starkey district four commissioner fitzpatrick aye district five commissioner mariano aye district one chairman oakley aye motion pass five-zero uh p-81 i believe at this time you give your instructions we can we can do that now resounding procedures there are two rezoning agendas regular and consent staff will present each application to the board of county commissioners if staff for planning commission has recommended approval and if there's no opposition the application will be considered by the board without further presentation if staff or planning commission has recommended denial or if there is opposition to the application the applicant will be given five minutes for presentation the opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes for a group representative and the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal any individual disagreeing with staff for planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of rezoning may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda in which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during this meeting otherwise all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote if you wish to speak to any petition please give your name and address and

whether or not you've been sworn for the record these are quasi-judicial public hearings the law in florida is that mere public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action please limit your comments to those criteria found within the board's land development code okay p81 proof i don't think your message you'll be to go through this ring and even though um if you need to go through the swearing-in portion if anyone was here to speak to these items this continues no that's proof given these are consent items and the and again this one's a continuum and a continuance why don't we hold off and see whether there's somebody live to testify before we go through this okay so item p81 was published in the tampa bay times on january 27th 2021 thank you mr chairman item p1 is a zoning amendment in the name of terry and tina gillette which is a change in zoning from an ac air cultural district in ar 5 mh agricultural mobile home district uh in east central pasco county on the north side of messick road 0.75 miles east of old lakeland highway containing about 12.15 acres requesting a continuance to the march 23rd bcc yeah since this is private clearance anyone want to speak to this item now or wait till that time when it comes back continue to well do you have any you have anybody is anybody signed up no one has signed up on for item p81 okay so no one signed up to speak at all terry your agenda who you you've changed your recommendation from the agenda memo is the agenda memo says continue to a date uncertain okay uh excuse me i contacted staff and staff is indicating to the 23rd they want they want it for okay that's fine just okay so i entertain a motion i'll move continue time certain state certain see if there's a i don't think there's anybody at the kiosk but if you don't want any kiosks to speak to this adam there's no one at the kiosk all right thank you okay move to continue to date and time certain as stated by mr peters second yeah got a motion a second to continue uh roll call vote district 2 commissioner moore district 3 commissioner starkey aye district 4 commissioner fitzpatrick aye district 5 commissioner mariano aye district 1 chairman oakley aye most past five zero p 82 oh gosh roof p82 was published in the tampa bay times on january 27 2021. the university chairman item p82 is the conditional use request the name of duke energy florida incorporated

slash united states air force 35 it's for a 35-foot radar platform for use in conjunction with the operation of the u.s air force test and training range and an ac agricultural district in southwest pasco county west of bailey's bluff road north of the duke energy power plant and it comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions okay and is there one uh is african here to speak to this item well these are consent items these are consent i'm sorry abnormally is there anybody here that wants to speak against this adam there is no one on webex and there's no email for this item okay appearing no one won't check the kiosk anyone speak to p82 there's no one here for this item all right thank you it remains on consent next p 83 item p83 was published in the tampa bay times on february 17 2021. item p83 is a resolution by the border county commissioners in pasco county florida designating that area commonly referred to as quote the pond phase three unquote as a street lighting service area and consolidating the pond phase three and the existing the pond phases one and two into a new consolidated quote the pond street light service area unquote for street light improvements and establishing the levy of assessments against the property benefited by street lighting improvements and authorizing an assessment rate increase in accordance with the pascua county code of ordinances chapter 94 article 2 sections 94-46 through 94-56 it comes to you with a recommendation of approval is anyone here to speak uh to this against this item is there anyone at the kiocks there's no one at the kiosk thank you no one on webex and there are no emails on this item okay remains on consent p84 item p84 was published in the tampa bay times on february 10th 2021. item p84 is robert's road pvas number 3431 in the amounts of fifty three thousand six hundred ninety nine dollars and it comes to you with recommendation of approval okay is anyone here to speak against this app and one of the kiosks to speak against p84 there's no one at the kiosk thank you there's no one on webex and there's no email on this item okay pleasure the board on um the consent items p82 p83 and p84 move to approve the constitution second got a motion a second all those in favor by roll call vote district 2 commissioner moore aye district 3 commissioner starkey aye district 4 commissioner fitzpatrick aye

district 5 commissioner mariano aye district 1 chairman oakley aye motion pass 5-0 okay that's that's the end of our uh regular meeting except i have one item they were drawing the um the boundaries for i guess terry maybe you step up or whoever answered this but they were drawing the outline when we left we voted for the moratorium i did not think my district one was in that moratorium and i wish it would not be in that moratorium but there's a there's a map saying that from 52 back to push i mean uh bruce be downs it is a line that includes part of my district and i wish it not be a part of it i'm saying that now because they're starting the process for going through the moratorium yeah so mr chairman part of it i think it's weird part of his does come in there um so i appreciate it so my question to you would be because i actually think the public when we go to before the public hearing should be when we should probably have this discussion um but my question to you would be does that mean if your areas this area is taken out that you're going to vote for it because you actually voted against us moving forward with this at that meeting you were on the you're a naval so if you're still going to be in a vote you know why would be while we make a change to benefit what you think is well used against this about my district but you voted against it you voted against it you voted against moving forward so i say no we don't make any concessions at this time you were an you're in a vote but if you're willing if you're stating now that you will be for it in that area which included my district then i'd be willing to have that conversation well that's that's actually what i am saying i'm saying if you want that moratorium in your district i'm okay with that you are i'm okay with you having that in your district okay but i just don't want it in my district i don't have an issue i just want to make sure okay and i don't have a problem uh making decisions in my district yeah okay now and i appreciate it okay i appreciate it yeah i just want to make sure we're on the but we have to vote on it yeah to get my district part taken out of that that's that's all an amount okay i understand i just wanted to make sure i support you in what you're asking for i see okay i just don't want my discrimination okay i appreciate it though i appreciate it i'm okay with that so i got my district in there and we said no no no

statement 54. as voted on no no we said my district is not in it your district is the southern part needs to come out uh up to bruce be down oh maybe that is it yeah i think it's uh that the line follows 54 56. yeah i think they kept yeah i was thinking that was it winfield's and all that that jordan okay so can you put the map back up i have some questions i guess this would be the time to bring them up okay yeah that's that's the one without on the map what this is a map with a doubt without district one okay my question is there are some projects in there specifically that have already they've already developed the retail now they already have been approved for their multi-family apartments are they allowed to continue to move forward because if they built all the retail i want to make sure that they're allowed to have the citizens to we can't stop that they already have the entitlements they already have the entitlements they have they already have the entitlements we can't take away entitlements that's what we discussed before so we're not changing we're not taking away somebody's current zoning right it's still there it's still good it's still there so if they still have it they already have it they have it so i know the one they have a very large property so up in the top north east they already have these hunters fine but what you talk about connerton uh the groves the groves is not in my district they already have their entitlements in my district oh okay the groves already has the titles for multi-family they're already there and they have you can't take them away from them okay yeah south west i know you're talking about yeah yeah they already have their entitlements yeah they're good so i need a motion yeah so the map up there is the moratorium without district one in it i'm okay with that okay you gotta make a motion yeah i'll make the motion oh second that's pretty easy i can second it i can second it too yeah well i can't i think i heard a second so okay so the motion is to provide more direction to staff right what they will bring forward to less out that area of district one which is right included in the current map that has been generated prior to advertising yes okay my roll call vote hi all right [Music] there was a newspaper actually a tv article on channel 8.

why don't vote on the project when it comes up that's the conflict of interest but you but you can confess to the rest of the commission your concerns about my one property is in one of the commission forced pvases and after the storm the road was literally upside down there were cars stuck in the road and it was mud and we have a smooth we had a smooth rate road before the storm and then all of a sudden it completely turned upside down i yeah i remember one of the county employees um who's an engineer actually um cindy jolly said she actually was looking out her window when the road lifted and cracked and turned into mush yeah no garbage trucks no mail no school buses couldn't drive on it yeah okay so back then i would definitely have been for it i'm still for it but i know what they look like all right we're staying adjourned bye