06.02.2020 Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Virtual Meeting (Afternoon)

okay good afternoon everybody I like to call back to order the Pasco County Board of County Commission meeting of June 2nd 2020 and I'd like to remind everybody that please silence your phones or your electronic devices and mute your minds and move along with our public hearings madam clerk we have proof item P 1 yes item P 1 was published in the tip of a times on May 20th 2 1 mm the orange by the County Board of County Commissioners a minute to pass McKenna Lane evelopment Code section 1 3 0 to point to mobility for you to increase in mobility fees from multifamily in the urban suburban rural standard fee table to decreased mobility fees worship to find low income single family and multi-family and decreased mobility fees for vacant parcel incentive zone area the other amendments as necessary ensure internal consistency proof probability repeal severability inclusion in the past with county land development code and effective dates and in the first hearing so this is an introduction the action will be required so mr. pizza I think you're on board mr. chairman one clarification it's not introduction this is the first public hearing oh well thank you for that and that notes that's okay mr. chairman this is I'm gonna go ahead and turn the mic over to okay good afternoon commissioners I apologize I can't be on my screen if the slides are up so we do not see a slide on our end no work and we're getting on okay because I was unable to share my screen so either way there you go okay great thank you so much um as you mentioned this is the first reading are the second reading and adoption hearing will is scheduled for June 16th and will also be a virtual meeting this comes for you out of the February 25th 2020 BCC workshop where we discussed multifamily and housing the proposed changes to the mobility fee table are consistent with harbors redevelopment plan recommendations to focus redevelopment efforts in the West Market area as well as the comprehensive plan policies that promote a more efficient use of infrastructure adequate development and more efficient growth patterns on May 21st 2020 the local planning agency found this in fact to be consistent with the comprehensive plan and has recommended the approval of these changes to the mobility fee tables the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation that the effective date for the increase of those mobility fees to be changed from August 10th 2020 which is what is originally in your packet to January 1st 2021 date again is for the increase of the fees decrease in the fees would be effective immediately following the state being submitted to the state those changes are summarized here and in your packet in the following ways for the urban tables the urban standard is the only one that you will see the increase for the multifamily ment units the other categories of the single-family detached and multi-family defined units you will see that the incentive has been increased to a hundred percent and that will be across

all urban tables the multifamily again it is only in the urban gendered table that you'll see the increase of the fees next this also shows again the in the urban table series there was also a change to the title for Table four seven four - five in order to accommodate the vacant parcel incentive zone fee schedule to align itself with the redevelopment fee schedule so again it you'll see the changes single-family detached and multi-family ship define units 100% incentivized as well as the vacant parcel incentive zone here the summary is the same for the suburban suburban standard is the only one that you'll see the multi-family increase and the same a hundred percent incentivize for the ship to find units like urban next and and the same for the rural next in summary just to make clear that the multi-family in the mobility feed tables that will not see an increase to the net fee is the following the low-rise condominium townhouses the high-rise condominium age-restricted multifamily and congregate care facility additionally the multifamily apartments in muhtaram T and E or Tod will also not see an increase in the net fee there were some next there were some minor text amendments to make sure that it was in line with the table changes and you'll see these in your packet as well as in these two slides here and again there's no action required today okay anybody many questions already want me to go ahead and go first to public comment and then come back to that okay everybody hear me okay good okay guys with that okay so we do have some people signed up to speak I will go to the clerk and we'll go from there yes for item p1 we have three people and start with miss Dominic haha please state your name and address for the record and start your comment hello my name is Dominic ah I reside at one 6:01 East Genesee Street and that is in Tampa Florida and my comment my comment is I am first thank you to Jeffery Jenkins the executive planner for letting me speak to him so that I can get a clear understanding of the ordinance which is ordinance one three zero two point two and that is the increase of mobility fees so that affordable and adequate housing can be in the area I am in agreement with that ordinance being passed so that more families can be attracted to the area and increase the living in that area and make sure it's affordable for others to build in that area well thank you mr. Cobb anything else miss come no just thank you on behalf of st. Pete College I am a student of public policy and administration and I just want to thank you all for letting me speak today and also mr. Jenkins for accessing my call and giving me insightful information okay thanks so much have a great day we appreciate you thank you okay madam clerk next person person on the next two people are from Bay Area Apartment Association I have mr. Eric Garduno please state your name and address for the record and start

your comment mr. Garduno yeah sorry about that my name is Eric or do you know I am the Dermer affairs director for the Bay Area partner Association or addresses pillbox 15 1958 Tampa Florida 3 3 6 8 4 I'm here to speak about agenda item T 1 go ahead um Gold ah thank you good afternoon commissioners thanks for this opportunity to speak the Bay Area Apartment Association is a not-for-profit trade association that represents the apartment industry in the greater Tampa region we're happy to see this proposal reduces mobility fees for affordable multi-family housing but we are concerned that it increases fees for multi-family housing in the standard urban suburban and role categories we also note that if this proposal does go forward we do support the Planning Commission's recommendation that the higher fees were standard multifamily housing be delayed until 2021 because of the coronavirus there was it long ago that the Commission said mobility rates were for the county which addressed fees for dozens of land use categories today's proposal looks to single out multifamily development and seems arbitrary in light of this recent action we also note that the barrier workshop discussing this proposal it was said that apartments would be built even if the fees were increased according to the county is data that was presented during that workshops though it showed that 20% of the apartment mobility fees collected by the county come from the suburban category and none come from the rule category to us that shows that actually for those two categories at least it seems that more incentives are in line not less because the people just aren't building they're more importantly though we are concerned that this actually reflects sentiments that discount the importance of apartment communities to the county growing numbers of Millennials empty nesters and members of our work for critical workforce like first responders and school teachers are renters by choice apartments give them your constituents housing options that are comfortable and full of first-rate amenities market data demonstrates actually their strong demand for apartments in Pasco County with occupancy rates over 92% for the last 10 years even as the apartments are added each year the other thing to keep in mind are the economic contribution that apartments make to the county each each apartment community represents millions of dollars of investments and each represents jobs construction jobs to build them on-site management to run them and professional services like plumbers and electricians to fix them as you consider this proposal we ask that you please keep in mind the apartment communities and what they do to the county and with that just in my comments thank you again for this opportunity I think I have maybe a colleague also online who will speak a little bit more to the affordable housing aspects of the of the proposal thank you all right thank you sir for your comments I'm next

madam clerk the last caller for p1 is Miss Wendy malinka vit Moline Kovac I didn't I apologize before she goes I do see Miss Wilhite has signed up - did she not get on she's she's registered on WebEx unfortunately her name was none other list but she's on WebEx okay I do have them I do have a list that says for p1 I have Dominic Cobb Eric or dunno the next person windy Melinda Milankovitch and I have Barbara Wilhite that's all my list for public comment so just letting you know let's go ahead with the next person up and then I'll let you guys figure that out please state your name and address for the record and start your comment yes hello my name is Wendy Milankovitch I am representing the Bay Area Apartment Association when I'm speaking on item t1 good afternoon commissioners thank you for this opportunity to speak before you today I am the vice president of the Bay Area Apartment Association I am also a regional manager for Royal American Management we manage apartment communities throughout the Tampa Bay region included in Pasco County in addition to the points raised by my colleague we also want to commend work done on the draft ordinance as it relates to affordable housing according to the 2019 rental market survey conducted by the Schomburg Center for Housing study at the University of Florida twenty-nine percent of Pasco county's population is considered low income and pay more than 30% of their income towards housing this is a clear indication that additional affordable housing is needed in our county despite this need it is often a challenge to build affordable multi-family housing between increasing costs of land labor and materials that go into buildings and maintaining apartment communities it is difficult to keep rent at a level that low-income households can afford without specific incentives provided by government that is why we are grateful that the draft ordinance reduces mobility impact feeds changes to affordable multi-family at construction mobility fees for affordable housing are reduced to zero across every zone within the county according to the National Apartment Association on average 14 cents of every dollar charged in rent goes towards government taxes and fees reduction in fees could create the margins that make the difference between a project being built or not providing incentives like these is an important proactive measure by local government thank you for considering our points around the importance of multi-family housing to the people of Pasco County and again we applaud you for taking steps to better encourage affordable housing development in our County thank you thank you ma'am did we figure out if miss Wilhite is on the line yes sir or me yes sir she's actually on WebEx so oh she can hear us okay good afternoon commissioners I apologize for the confusion because I'm an also an applicant I'm on WebEx and I didn't know how to be on both at the same time because I my phone had your on

my phone and my computer so I guess I want to participate by WebEx and thank you yeah I got worried when you didn't say it I was like and I was I was communicating with Denis about what did I do wrong because that's very likely with all those this technology I am here to on behalf of crown Community Development my long-term client they have the water grass project at Curley Road and overpass and the chapel crossing project at 54 and curly water grass was entitled in 2004 always had a requirement for multifamily in their town center which now they have worked with the county to become a business center called promenade Business Center they have a pending deal after all these years since 2004 to 2020 16 years later after a huge investment the project they have a pending deal for multifamily development and midstream here they get noticed that you're intending to take away the incentive which effectively increases their fees the mobility fees for that project by 17% it seems like an unintended consequence because your stated goal was the urban service area and in trying to specifically target disincentivizing apartment projects along the 54:56 corridor from 41 to 581 and it seems like this project is now got wrapped up into in that in that effort to the detriment of something that they didn't do anything wrong they followed the entitlements that they were actually required by mr. Gallagher to put on that property as a town center back in 2004 they also the chapel cross news project was entitled in 2015 again has a multi-family component as an entitlement they have a pending finally of a pending contract on that and now they've have a proposed 7% increase it comes as quite a shock to them they haven't done anything but what you approved over the years and moving forward their projects they've been great partners with the county they put Sevenoaks as an outstanding community so is water grass Chapel will be as well so I know planning commission to delay the effective date or recommended that you all delay the expected date to January 1 problem with that is that doesn't really if you have a pending deal that hasn't even gotten to the middle the site plan there's no way to get building permits submitted by that deadline so I would like to see some kind of consideration for this scenario I'm and so that crown doesn't get hurt as you try to reprioritize and Riaan sent avise where you want future development thank you mr. Wilhite and that Creek that was a last person okay all right guys put it just go back to staff now I wait for you guys to fix the camera there you're believing for Miss will hide up there [Laughter] and all right team and you plug whoever talks next so somebody has to talk for it to change okay okay so we heard from our from our callers I know I'm just go back to the workshop that we had and we send out everybody was an agreement to move or what this staff I appreciate the job you did you've followed our direction exactly as we gave it to you just to going back to some of the

comments that were made I it's in a certain area personally around that 5456 corridor but there was other commissioners that had concerns about other areas i know commissioner oakley had concerns I'll let you guys speak for yourselves but just want to bring that up going down further to Zephyrhills an area commissioner Starkey mitches he had concerns going all the way up into if I'm not correct Odessa but I'll let her state that ourselves but I know what the Planning Commission did I watched the video of the Planning Commission meeting I'm just gonna be 100% honest with you I don't know if they fully understood what was going on I thought I saw some confusion there I felt there was confusion be honest with you no I think the date needs to be said I'm this staff I mean we could get this done and easily you know by the in September if not the first scepter by the end of September dad I saw commissioners Starkey's hand up I think if I'm correct I think I saw her hand up yeah so I had a couple questions for Barbara um Barbara if they're doing a multi-family in a downtown called pregnant wouldn't that get the big zapped because of the Tod require me wait we're right this is not a happen she's not this is an ordinance guys we can't talk to speakers yes Jack Jack so I thought I'd read in here or the planner that that multifamily within a Tod does get the discount am I miss reading that that's my understanding but I think David's on the line he can answer that question for you this is David Goldstein there's no increase the murderer we have had discussions with Barbara about her her client qualifying for the muhtaram rape he was okay um I also want to say that I do recall in the conversation that I felt that 19 corridor and holiday and anything east of west of gun huh I think is where we put the line still and would love to see some redevelopment a multi families this line at in my mitt so David we can't hear you we're gonna you need to fix that buddy can you help me now yeah I can't the weaponary development the fee is already zero and this ordinance will also these throw first vacant parcels in the West market area as well okay I see it it cannot hear you having technical difficulties so just ahead multifamily within a muhtaram or Tod is still incentivized but what market is still incentivized and low income is still incentivized and the way we're getting money to build the low income a workforce housing is with it offset of the discount that we've given before correct so I think it's important that we do raise some of this money i if my fellow board members felt this way I would be okay with maybe say this suburban 50 percent or 25 percent incentive for a little while and see what we get and you know maybe have it sunset in three years or something if you want it to incentivize it a little bit but why throw that out there for discussion um you know I thought we were to pretty much agreement at a workshop so I don't I don't know why we change it

but you know and one of the things we talked about was you know the issues along those corridors and wanting to keep and have job creating sites and if somebody says it's gonna discourage them from his apartments in well guess what it goes then it goes commercial or office which is better it's better for the community it's better for the county's better for a long term and I mean that I I don't I want to beat a dead horse my right now is my opinion on it anybody have anything else to say or any questions so no conditioner I just wanted to make clear that we don't have a different boundary as discussed in the workshop for the mobility fee so the mobility feed map stays the same in terms of urban suburban rural there isn't a further delineation as perhaps miss will have suggested you know if it's outside of that boundary along the corridor between 41 and 301 or something like that that is not in this ordinance I just wanted to clarify that but I thought that's what was discussed at the workshop that we would say from Gunn highway West was not being targeted for distance and sanitizing commissioner key this is notorious because with planning and development I think what you're referring to there is land use part of the discussion that was at the workshop with regard to the mobility fees it was actually really received was to address the mobility tables which are quite common one in the various categories urban suburban and rural um mr. PTO's what and I talked to Dan brought this briefly yesterday um if this is adopted how soon can we get this implemented what's early jammer 1st October 1st what you what David well if the mobility P amendments here get adopted the earliest I believe is August at time and if the Planning Commission discussion was no get we stole we're gonna lose a job green insides real nobody gonna add six more months to it but that um where's Mariana Thank You mr. chairman so I'm not sure if I could understood with chapel crossings and water grass I mean we plan to promenade a town center in there which is appropriate for it is that going to work from what has been designed or no can I get answer from either David or Jeff staff Business Center all fine is the muhtaram project ok all of ours is a muhtaram project will be not be subject to okay thank you yeah anything else for everybody else okay so we're all good with how it stands them yes your chair yeah all right what I know I know one issue dan and I spoke yesterday I know one issue could be when you mentioned Terry mentioned August 10th is I think the team would probably prefer that it's at the beginning of a month and make life a little bit easier for everybody so let's say if se you soon as would be August 10th so we might have to even though I like pushing it back we might have to look at September I guess first instead of August is that true Dan is that what you told me you're like yeah first of the month is always easier than a day in the

middle of the month for something like this so whether it's September 1st October 1st that's always easiest from an implementation standpoint yeah again way to make it easy on the team is everybody good with September 1st ok great all right thank you all go access this time yeah your second hearing on this will be on June 16th at 1:30 p.m. and you'll still be doing them as virtual meetings thank you mr. Stein Snider I appreciate it then p2 madam clerk continue but I need whoever Clara staff member is going to techniques Hernandez Planning and Development item p2 is PDD 2005 64 it's for plan amendment from res 3 and RoR - Reza's this is a request for continuance the June 16th virtual order County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 would you continue time certain of a motion by Commissioner Mariana to have a second second I was second by Commissioner Wells madam clerk please call the roll three my district for commissioner wells our district five commission Murano uh District two chairman more hi motion passes 5-0 to continued to June 16 2020 thank you okay one second here gonna move on to the public hearings so go ahead and read the procedures for rezoning mr. Stein Schneider please be happy to mr. chairman there are two rezoning agendas regular and consent staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners if staff or Planning Commission has recommended approval and there's no opposition the application will be considered by the board without further presentation if staff or Planning Commission has recommended denial or if there is opposition to the application the applicant will be given five minutes for presentation the opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes for a group representative and the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal any individual disagreeing with staff or Planning Commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda in which case that application will be heard under the agenda later on during the meeting otherwise or rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote if you wish to speak to any petition please give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record these are quasi-judicial public hearings the law in florida is that near public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action please limit your comments to those criteria found within the board's land development code thank you and we have two public hearings on the consent agenda these eyes will be approved with one boat without a presentation list or someone here in objection does it pre-register to speak to any of the items on the public hearing agenda prior to speaking will need to be sworn in so madam clerk why don't we go ahead and take care of that

now you are to speak on any of these items please raise your hand and give you sworn in do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth so help you God okay well I would assume they all said yes right okay so let's go ahead what piece three we approve this item publishes the Tampa Bay Times on April 8th 2020 p3 is PDD 27 for 72 in the name of William Scott and Michelle callosum him for a change in zoning from AC to C 2 that comes to you with a recommendation of continuance to the June 16 virtual BC meeting at 1:30 p.m. I'll entertain a motion to continue this I'm on a June 16th Lord to continue time certain motion by Commissioner effective I have a second by Commissioner Starkey to continue this item madam clerk please call the roll district 1 Commissioner Oakley our district it's not wells I district 5 Mariano high high motion kept I was here oh thank you p4 item p4 was published in the Tempe time March 27 2020 he didn't eat 27 for 54 see in the name of Iqbal groves from a change in zoning from an AC to an RM age the applicant has can ask that this item be continued to a date uncertainty to continue it from a date uncertain looks like Commissioner Mariano second by Commissioner I have a second by Commissioner Oakley madam clerk please call the roll mr. Kwan Commissioner Oakley district 3 Commissioner Starkey I know Wells I district 5 Commissioner Mariano hi mister - chairman thank you okay pe5 item p5 was published in the template times on march 13th 20 PDD 27 475 little Lake Thomas and PUD nnz corporations and two sisters Land Trust rezoning from r12 an MP UD it's the request for continuance to 16th virtual VCC meeting at 1:30 p.m. to continue time certain Oh mr. Mariana continued second by Commissioner Starkey madam clerk please call the roll for the record it was June 16 2020 have kind of cut out on her audio for the record district 1 Commissioner Oakley our district three commissioners Starkie district 4 Commissioner wells our district 5 Commissioner Mariano high - chairman Warren hi motion passes 5-0 items 5 6 & 7 on the consent and uh madam clerk do we have proof yes for item P 6 it was published in the Tampa Bay Times on April 18 2020 in item P 7 I was published in the Tampa Bay Times on April 15 2020 and by affidavit of certified mail outs and posting at the site and I do know that piece 7 has been pulled off consent because we have people that are wanting to speak to it so I'm sick that Grandes PDB twenty seven four seven three is p6 PTA rentals Inc for a change in zoning from a our agricultural residential district to c2 general commercial district comes to you whether recommendation of a proof from the Planning Commission and a Planning and Development Department thank you I'll entertain a motion that's the only consent item now come on - fruit I have a motion by Commissioner Oakley Peru the consent agenda have a second good mr.

Starkey I got a second by Commissioner Mariano madam clerk please call the roll district one Commissioner Oakley all right district three Commissioner Starkey District two chairman more hi motion passes 5-0 thank you so we will move on to again p7 was pulled madam clerk we approve yes item p7 was published in the Tampa Bay Times April 15 2020 and by affidavit by certified mail outs and posting at the site will be presented by will Kuhn commissioners is will Pippen PE senior engineer in current planning I do have a powerpoint presentation if that could be pulled up appreciate it thank you very much I am seven is sandhill flats LLC it's a conditional used land excavation operation permit application location of the site is on the south side of Tyndall Road possibly 3/4 mile west of the intersection of Tyndall road in curly room slide please and earlier say no flats land excavation operation permit to allow approximately five hundred thousand cubic yards of soil to be excavated and exported from the site on approximately 30 acres of the overall 59 plum and acres slide and it is in zoning and future land use of agriculture in red sweet future land use thanks slide please and I will summarize this but as I mentioned earlier is a plant excavation permit safety reasons you know the entire project will be fit with tracking in and out gravel beds to minimize offset impacts gates will be located strategically as determined by the engineer in the field yeah phase project phase 1 and phase 2 on the excavation of the material slightly worrying discharge or oppose and/or allow approximately the project will take 24 months of the operation since it starts and of course they'll be dependent on the film material demands within the area and of course it will be stabilized when it's restored and so forth and around the excavated genius thanks slide please looks like very similar like I was saying earlier this is within the connected city battery limits it's in flood zone X the existing Road will be utilize as the Tyndall Road 20 foot wide within the 56 feet of county right-of-way your lane uses rips three there was a neighborhood virtual meeting that was held due to the köppen 19 since you change so the neighborhood meeting was helped by the applicant and the owner to the nearby citizens and I think twice we follow 4.2 operating permits laying a sebacean permit next slide please as I mentioned earlier and complies for the code and iconic comprehensive plans and since it is consistent as conditioned make slide please here's a map Lord site plan of the excavated area it's like I said earlier is in two phases the area in the middle is the first phase as it slowly graduate gets execrated further throughout the process phase 2 is the outer limits as shown in the blue color areas thanks so I please so based off with you plan development department recommend a

condition and as noted any questions any questions the board any questions all right is the applicant on the line yes mr. chairman Joel Chiu for the applicant go ahead sir Thank You mr. chairman ladies and gentlemen Nigel two associates Palm Harbor Florida Glenna News Council for the applicant and I have been sworn the applicant of sand hill makes LLC which is owned by mr. JD Porter and mr. Justin grace we submitted and procured our Swift mud permit over a year ago for this excavation permit so we understand that we have to meet all of this with mud permit conditions and the property owners will make sure they're good operator does so as you just heard we have a step step recommendation for approval the staff requested 31 conditions of approval which I believe are pretty standard from the staff and county policy for all markets we did not negotiate or quibble with any of those we agreed to all 31 without any requested changes and we're happy to do so and the property owners commit that they will make certain their pit operator complies with them I intend to attach those conditions to the contract the pit operator so that they have no choice but to comply and of course code enforcement will help ensure that they comply with all of those conditions the Planning Commission represented unanimous approval of this I did conduct as as mr. Boone stated I conducted the neighborhood meeting as a virtual process as per the policy that was provided to me by the staff I did speak with mr. Guber oath who owns the property immediately to the west across government Road he had no objection I spoke with mr. Grove who is the president the King Lake Club they owned the property contiguous to ourselves they also had no objection there are communications with mr. Dolan and I believe he is a register to speak there were numerous emails of mr. Dolan which I did in that record to the Planning Commission we did our best to respond to all this questions and to address his comments as best we can they do point out that mr. Nolan's property is not within the 500 foot radius and he also was not on the haul route as he lives west on Tyndall Road west of God and is not between God early wrote it which will be the designated haul route so the haul route does not pass this property the conditions of approval it addressed the hours of operation we're in agreement with those they addressed noise level controls both during the loading and hauling period and also during all other periods so we are obligated to comply with those noise level limits and we'll make sure operator does so we have specific requirements for Tindall road maintenance we have to post a maintenance bond with the county to ensure that our operator complies with those maintenance requirements potential Road requirements include fugitive dust control which the county will dictate and control repair of any potholes rather damage restoration of the road

condition we have to maintain access conditions for all the jacent properties there are between the site and headed out to curly for over 3/4 of that way there are no residences on either side there are a few residents is right at curly on the north side the we're required to post signage about the truck traffic to protect other members of the public and to hurt people of the operation were required to do all truck stacking on site not out on Tyndall so we have to make provisions internal to the site for any truck stacking before the loading process and again we have no access west on Tyndall which would go past mr. Dolan property most importantly due to the connected city approvals which you're aware of there is already a requirement for Tindall Road to be permanently in County standard that is already in the construction plan view processed by Metro related to the efforts and CCM PUD which I also processed as you know up a year or so ago so the good news is that the plan of the owners obviously when we get past the kovat situation is to get this pit operating all of the connected city development that you have underway all of the vo pH development that we're now getting very strong activity and interest in that site development obviously requires fill dirt so while we understand it is an unnecessary inconvenience for those who are directly impacted my clients commit to try to make that inconvenience as short as possible if the demand is there they are totally incentivized to wrap this up as quickly as possible we hope it is only just a few short months your standard period for the conditional uses two years we hope to be out of this before then and then this road will actually be permanently improved by Metro but under the connected city program no calls from any of the residents no passes and unfortunately as I stated you can't develop those connected city and view properties without filter you can't build the roadways that are required there without filtered and we actually believe that this term will be used right there in unit area for connected city vo pH and the roadways that have to be improved under those financial plan so with that said we urge you to approve this I would like to just have a moment of rebuttal if required after any public member speaks and I'm happy to answer any questions I believe I also have JD and Justin on the call and our civil engineer John Landon and also our traffic they do we have any questions from the commissioners this time it's obscuring you can ask questions of the applicant now like he pushes to the other I just AM statement this is in my district I've told mr. Nolan are powerful any person in that area that this would affect and goods that are put on here by staff I thank her very well but make sure that you'd not buy those restrictions and they can only travel from these which doesn't make people persons in general I think in the rodents the that he returned to this but I think Jenna wrote is placed there to

he aide and he turn from now after wishes to do this as quickly as possible so they won't be running instruction on new paper and that happens I think you have up to two years with restrictions and and the warehouse to live dirt great we're doesn't affect the people very long I think it's pretty good they call him thank you any other questions Dean do have people that signed up for public count that alert is that men support sociable Barrett you so you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth so help you God thank you there was next time Thank You Stewart and Dolan certainly yeah okay so my address is three one four five to ten de Road I'm on the phone to speak to agenda item p7 or Oh sandals flats are a pet or dirt mind as we like to refer to it off offend or governments the virtual coded nineteen meeting process put in place by the county resulted in the cancellation of the public neighborhood meeting for this project substituting instead just a quiet mailing to four adjacent but absolutely property owners who obviously do not share the concerns that those of us who physically reside here do there was no virtual meeting public meeting per se there was just that mailing even so at least one of those adjacent property owners mr. Luger bro has written to you now in a reversal of his original position to add his releases many who oppose this project but for the many of us that plan to attend the neighborhood meeting we were left with no voice and or not even visibility to the progress of this project through the counting approval process it was off of our radar and consequently our voices were muted those of us living on Kendall a substandard Road believe and with good reason that the dump truck traffic generated from this project which is permitted to operate twelve hours each day six days a week for up to two years will create extremely dangerous and possibly hazardous conditions on tend to run a single breath and physically resides on pendal is unopposed to this project anyone who lives on this road is fully aware of how fragile it how even normal traffic rapidly degrades it in the best of weather we all know the mud pit that it becomes during heavy and the watchword dustbowl that it is during the dry months and we know how spotty the county maintenance is on it now imagine the impact through the 35 South dump truck round trips required to move the estimated 500,000 yards of dirt from this mine imagine if mergency vehicles cannot easily transverse this road due to the damaged lives and property or unnecessarily risk from this project we have recently been through the same thing on a much smaller scale with the metro right excavation of Jan February that excavation on property adjacent suppose bar pit salt endl roads fiercely degraded there were allowed dump trucks stacked up all day long on Kendall i doing belching noxious fumes

waiting get out on to curling the county appeared to do little or nothing to repair the extensive damage on this handle and nothing to mitigate the dust and spite of calls from several residents including myself it's just common sense distinct there is no way to mitigate in real time the ongoing damage from a continuous stream of dump trucks we have many other valid concerns well it restarts weather like which I'd like to articulate to you but being granted only three minutes to speak on this in spite of my request for additional three minutes due to the fact that I speak for many means I cannot which works in favor a favor of the developer of quarters so I would like to even be allowed to have the opportunity to do a rebuttal to the rebuttal as mr. Zhu has asked but look none of you would want this in your backyard ruining your road and indeed please state your name and address for the record and also if you have been sworn hi my name is mark Stover address three one zero zero seven Kendall Road have you been swimming no mr. Stoker do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth so help you God go ahead I couldn't I couldn't they're okay I am a homeowner of approximately twelve years my Tyndall Road home which to the west of the proposed Sand Hill flats borrow pit which is agenda item p7 and item I wish to speak about I have concerns regarding the for the pit I did speak to Commissioner Oakley yesterday and he laid some of my fears by cleaning the conditions that are part of the proposed approval those conditions as I understand it including prohibiting dump trucks from traveling west on Tyndall as well as requiring the company to maintain the approximately 3/4 of a mile of roadway running east occur Road however these conditions still concern me for one the homeowners to the east of me still have to contend with the procession of dump trucks but primarily my concern is for how the company can possibly maintain the road as it exists today during the rainy season Tyndall as a completely unpaved and unimproved dirt road already turns into absolute mud pit during periods of heavy rain in SW experience every year and that's without heavy trucks there's no way the company would be able to maintain that road during periods unless they substantially improve the road by either paving it laying down considerable amount of lime rock or stone to elevate the road bed unless they do that to keep the road passable they'll have to suspend operations at the whim of the weather at times during the rainy season and I don't believe they'll do that therefore I'm the right condition to place on Sand Hill flat that this project is to be approved and to require them not only to maintain but the truth improve the road between the project and Curly by paving or substantially upgrading the road that before they begin the project without that there's no chance the road will be able to be maintained during periods of the rainy season and if there's any question about that I

point seven square foot portion of the plotted right-of-way located on Clark Street in Arman way and Hudson Florida this property is also known as in on the goal next slide please the parking configuration surrounding the property is compromised approximately fifty two parking spaces that either entirely or partially encroach onto the plot of right-of-way of Clark Street Norman way the petitioner is requesting from the occasion in order to obtain title to the portion of the parking spaces that encroach into the right-of-way after research and review the team recommends approval next slide please team would recommend approval in this item sir Mariano I'd like to mr. chairman if I could I say though you've done great job with us thanks for the whole team bringing it through it hasn't been a simple thing but it's definitely the right thing to do wait for public comment I believe that's Kevin I think your mic is off good ass good afternoon again sorry I have two different places to touch here good afternoon Barbara Wilhite representing the applicant I want to thank the county staff for their hard work on this it's an anomaly that it's been like this for so many years where the parking spots are they're half on the clients property and half on on the county's right-of-way we've come to a very good balance of how to protect the public interest moving forward but also to allow this great business and property owner of ours and Jam out there at Hudson Beach to be able to move forward and invest further in this property because he now has those parking spots so thank you again to staff for their hard work on us and the County Attorney's Office thank you um thank you mr. Wilhite do we have any questions for the applicant at this time any questions okay seeing no questions we do not have anybody signed up to speak on this item so if there's no further questions that it to the board move approval mr. chairman mr. stark okay so I have a commissioner Mariano made the motion then I have go ahead in second at it and I'm clerk please call the roll district one Commissioner Oakley [Music] chairman morning hi motion passes 5-0 and thank you everyone this was a very smooth meeting today good job to the staff and we'll see you next time thank you